4.7 Article

Continuous engagement of a self-specific activation receptor induces NK cell tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 205, 期 8, 页码 1829-1841

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20072446

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [K08 A1071016-01]
  4. Washington University Pilot and Feasibility program [DDRCC 5P30 DK052574]
  5. Max Kade Foundation
  6. Department of Pathology and Immunology
  7. Rheumatic Diseases Core Center [P30-AR48335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK) cell tolerance mechanisms are incompletely understood. One possibility is that they possess self-specific activation receptors that result in hyporesponsiveness unless modulated by self-major histocompatability complex (MHC)-specific inhibitory receptors. As putative self-specific activation receptors have not been well characterized, we studied a transgenic C57BL/6 mouse that ubiquitously expresses m157 (m157-Tg), which is the murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV)-encoded ligand for the Ly49H NK cell activation receptor. The transgenic mice were more susceptible to MCMV infection and were unable to reject m157-Tg bone marrow, suggesting defects in Ly49H(+) NK cells. There was a reversible hyporesponsiveness of Ly49H(+) NK cells that extended to Ly49H-independent stimuli. Continuous Ly49H-m157 interaction was necessary for the functional defects. Interestingly, functional defects occurred when mature wild-type NK cells were adoptively transferred to m157-Tg mice, suggesting that mature NK cells may acquire hyporesponsiveness. Importantly, NK cell tolerance caused by Ly49H-m157 interaction was similar in NK cells regardless of expression of Ly49C, an inhibitory receptor specific for a self-MHC allele in C57BL/6 mice. Thus, engagement of self-specific activation receptors in vivo induces an NK cell tolerance effect that is not affected by self-MHC-specific inhibitory receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据