4.4 Article

Respiratory responses to salinity, temperature and hypoxia of six caridean shrimps from different aquatic habitats

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.04.006

关键词

Caridean shrimps; Estuarine habitats; Hypoxia; Oxygen regulation; Oxygen consumption; Salinity changes

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the project Consolider-Ingenio [CSD2009-00065]
  2. Marie Curie fellowship
  3. European funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The respiratory response of six caridean shrimp species under different salinity and dissolved oxygen concentrations (DO) has been carried out at 20 and 25 degrees C. The lowest mean specific oxygen consumption rates (M-O2) were found for the less active benthic crangonids Crangon crangon and Philocheras monacanthus; whereas the highest ones corresponded to the two more mobile native palaemonids Palaemon longirostris and Palaemonetes varians. The level of oxygen regulation displayed by the different native species was mainly related with environmental characteristics of their common habitats: species with temporal (C. crangon) or permanent (P. varians) estuarine habitats tended to be more tolerant of salinity changes and/or hypoxia, than are fully marine (P. monacanthus) or freshwater (Atyaephyra desmarestii) species. The estuarine P. longirostris showed moderate oxygen independence, but rather independent of salinity and temperature fluctuations. The exotic shrimp P. macrodactylus seemed to have higher tolerance to hypoxia that its native counterpart P. longirostris at brackish waters, but only under moderate temperature (at 20 degrees C). Results of this study suggest that a simultaneous evaluation of respiration rates and their dependence on DO could be an integrative way of determining the potential effects of increased salinity, temperature and hypoxia on aquatic species with different mobility and/or from different habitats. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据