4.4 Article

Vertical and horizontal movements of sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) near Taiwan determined using pop-up satellite tags

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.11.018

关键词

Basking; Fisheries; Habitat; PSATs; Tagging; Temperature

资金

  1. Fisheries Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan [96AS-15.1.1-W-A4, 98AS-10.2.1-W-A1 (5), 99AS-10.2.1-W-A1(5)]
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [NA37RJ0199, NA67RJ0154]
  3. Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (JIMAR), University of Hawaii

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) are of substantial economic importance to Taiwan because of their seasonal abundance (April to October, with a peak from May to July) off the island's eastern coast. They are harvested by drift gill nets, set nets, harpoons, and as incidental bycatch by inshore longline fisheries. Although the biology of sailfish has been investigated in eastern Taiwan, there is a paucity of data on movement patterns. Pop-up satellite archival tags (PSATs) were used to study the vertical and horizontal movements of three sailfish in 2008. The fish were tagged near the southeastern coast of Taiwan and linear displacements ranged from 1050 to 1400 km (similar to 40 km day(-1)) from deployment to pop-up locations and all movements were confined to the East China Sea. Sailfish spent 88% of their time in the upper uniform mixed layer above 50 m, but made more extensive vertical movements during the nighttime (x = 60.61 m +/- 48.24 SD) than daytime (x = 35.21 m +/- 35.37 SD). Depths and ambient water temperatures visited ranged from 0 to 214 m and 30.0 degrees to 17.8 degrees C, respectively. However in all cases, the depth distribution appeared primarily limited by an 8 degrees C change in water temperature. Diel diving patterns also suggested basking behavior. Sailfish behavior makes them particularly vulnerable to surface fishing gears. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据