4.7 Article

Plant proximity perception dynamically modulates hormone levels and sensitivity in Arabidopsis

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 65, 期 11, 页码 2937-2947

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru083

关键词

Arabidopsis; auxins; brassinosteroids; gibberellins; hypocotyl elongation; plant proximity; shade avoidance syndrome

资金

  1. CSIC
  2. Ministerio de Educacion
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO)
  4. Gobierno de Chile
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (Xarba) [2009-SGR697]
  6. MINECO - FEDER [CSD2007-00036, BIO2008-00169, BIO2011-23489]
  7. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) refers to a set of plant responses initiated after perception by the phytochromes of light enriched in far-red colour reflected from or filtered by neighbouring plants. These varied responses are aimed at anticipating eventual shading from potential competitor vegetation. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the most obvious SAS response at the seedling stage is the increase in hypocotyl elongation. Here, we describe how plant proximity perception rapidly and temporally alters the levels of not only auxins but also active brassinosteroids and gibberellins. At the same time, shade alters the seedling sensitivity to hormones. Plant proximity perception also involves dramatic changes in gene expression that rapidly result in a new balance between positive and negative factors in a network of interacting basic helix-loop-helix proteins, such as HFR1, PAR1, and BIM and BEE factors. Here, it was shown that several of these factors act as auxin-and BR-responsiveness modulators, which ultimately control the intensity or degree of hypocotyl elongation. It was deduced that, as a consequence of the plant proximity-dependent new, dynamic, and local balance between hormone synthesis and sensitivity (mechanistically resulting from a restructured network of SAS regulators), SAS responses are unleashed and hypocotyls elongate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据