4.7 Article

Towards understanding vacuolar antioxidant mechanisms: a role for fructans?

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 1025-1038

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers377

关键词

Fructan; phenols; radicals; ROS; stress; sugars; vacuole

资金

  1. FWO Vlaanderen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent in vitro, in vivo, and theoretical experiments strongly suggest that sugar-(like) molecules counteract oxidative stress by acting as genuine reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers. A concept was proposed to include the vacuole as a part of the cellular antioxidant network. According to this view, sugars and sugar-like vacuolar compounds work in concert with vacuolar phenolic compounds and the oclassic' cytosolic antioxidant mechanisms. Among the biologically relevant ROS (H2O2, O-2, and OH), hydroxyl radicals are the most reactive and dangerous species since there are no enzymatic systems known to neutralize them in any living beings. Therefore, it is important to study in more detail the radical reactions between OH and different biomolecules, including sugars. Here, Fenton reactions were used to compare the OH-scavenging capacities of a range of natural vacuolar compounds to establish relationships between antioxidant capacity and chemical structure and to unravel the mechanisms of OHcarbohydrate reactions. The in vitro work on the OH-scavenging capacity of sugars and phenolic compounds revealed a correlation between structure and OH-scavenging capacity. The number and position of the CC type of linkages in phenolic compounds greatly influence antioxidant properties. Importantly, the splitting of disaccharides and oligosaccharides emerged as a predominant outcome of the OHcarbohydrate interaction. Moreover, non-enzymatic synthesis of new fructan oligosaccharides was found starting from 1-kestotriose. Based on these and previous findings, a working model is proposed describing the putative radical reactions involving fructans and secondary metabolites at the inner side of the tonoplast and in the vacuolar lumen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据