4.7 Article

'Overgrowth' mutants in barley and wheat: new alleles and phenotypes of the 'Green Revolution' Della gene

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 1603-1613

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert022

关键词

barley; DELLA; gibberellins (GA); overgrowth mutant; suppressor screen; wheat

资金

  1. CSIRO
  2. Grains Research and Development Corporation [CSP00126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A suppressor screen using dwarf mutants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) led to the isolation of overgrowth derivatives, which retained the original dwarfing gene but grew at a faster rate because of a new mutation. The new mutations were in the Slender1 (Sln1) gene (11/13 cases), which encodes the DELLA protein central to gibberellin (GA) signalling, showed 100% genetic linkage to Sln1 (1/13), or were in the Spindly1 (Spy1) gene (1/13), which encodes another protein involved in GA signalling. The overgrowth mutants were characterized by increased GA signalling, although the extent still depended on the background GA biosynthesis capacity, GA receptor function, and DELLA activity. A comparison between two GA responses, -amylase production and leaf growth rate, revealed degrees of specificity for both the overgrowth allele and the GA response under consideration. Many overgrowth mutants were also isolated in a dwarf line of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and 19 new alleles were identified in the Rht-B1 gene, one of the Green Revolution semi-dwarfing genes and the orthologue of Sln1. The sites of amino acid substitutions in the DELLA proteins of both species provide insight into DELLA function, and included examples where identical but independent substitutions were observed. In both species, the starting lines were too dwarfed to be directly useful in breeding programmes, but new overgrowth derivatives with semidwarf heights have now been characterized. The variation they exhibit in GA-influenced traits identifies novel alleles with perfect markers that are of potential use in breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据