4.7 Article

Root attributes affecting water uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 63, 期 13, 页码 4751-4763

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers150

关键词

Aquaporin; drought; rice; root anatomy; root hydraulic conductivity; suberin

资金

  1. Generation Challenge Program project 'Targeting Drought-Avoidance Root Traits to Enhance Rice Productivity under Water-Limited Environments'
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lowland rice roots have a unique physiological response to drought because of their adaptation to flooded soil. Rice root attributes that facilitate growth under flooded conditions may affect rice response to drought, but the relative roles of root structural and functional characteristics for water uptake under drought in rice are not known. Morphological, anatomical, biochemical, and molecular attributes of soil-grown rice roots were measured to investigate the genotypic variability and genotypeenvironment interactions of water uptake under variable soil water regimes. Drought-resistant genotypes had the lowest night-time bleeding rates of sap from the root system in the field. Diurnal fluctuation predominated as the strongest source of variation for bleeding rates in the field and root hydraulic conductivity (Lp(r)) in the greenhouse, and was related to expression trends of various PIP and TIP aquaporins. Root anatomy was generally more responsive to drought treatments in drought-resistant genotypes. Suberization and compaction of sclerenchyma layer cells decreased under drought, whereas suberization of the endodermis increased, suggesting differential roles of these two cell layers for the retention of oxygen under flooded conditions (sclerenchyma layer) and retention of water under drought (endodermis). The results of this study point to the genetic variability in responsiveness to drought of rice roots in terms of morphology, anatomy, and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据