4.7 Article

A pharmacological analysis of high-affinity sodium transport in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): a 24Na+/42K+ study

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 2479-2489

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err419

关键词

Barley; compartmental analysis; electrophysiology; high-affinity Na+ uptake; ion transport; pharmacology; potassium; radiotracers; salinity; sodium

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil sodium, while toxic to most plants at high concentrations, can be beneficial at low concentrations, particularly when potassium is limiting. However, little is known about Na+ uptake in this 'high-affinity' range. New information is provided here with an insight into the transport characteristics, mechanism, and ecological significance of this phenomenon. High-affinity Na+ and K+ fluxes were investigated using the short-lived radiotracers Na-24 and K-42, under an extensive range of measuring conditions (variations in external sodium, and in nutritional and pharmacological agents). This work was supported by electrophysiological, compartmental, and growth analyses. Na+ uptake was extremely sensitive to all treatments, displaying properties of high-affinity K+ transporters, K+ channels, animal Na+ channels, and non-selective cation channels. K+, NH4+, and Ca2+ suppressed Na+ transport biphasically, yielding IC50 values of 30, 10, and < 5 mu M, respectively. Reciprocal experiments showed that K+ influx is neither inhibited nor stimulated by Na+. Sodium efflux constituted 65% of influx, indicating a futile cycle. The thermodynamic feasibility of passive channel mediation is supported by compartmentation and electrophysiological data. Our study complements recent advances in the molecular biology of high-affinity Na+ transport by uncovering new physiological foundations for this transport phenomenon, while questioning its ecological relevance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据