4.8 Article

Minimal asbestos exposure in germline BAP1 heterozygous mice is associated with deregulated inflammatory response and increased risk of mesothelioma

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 35, 期 15, 页码 1996-2002

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.243

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01CA106567, P01CA114047, P30CA071789, R01CA160715-0A]
  2. DoD CDMRP PRMRP Career Development Award
  3. V Foundation
  4. UHCC Pathology Shared Resource [P30 CA071789]
  5. Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation
  6. United-4A Cure
  7. Hawaii Community Foundation
  8. University of Hawaii Foundation
  9. Honeywell International Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to several cancers, in particular malignant mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy generally associated with professional exposure to asbestos. However, to date, we found that none of the mesothelioma patients carrying germline BAP1 mutations were professionally exposed to asbestos. We hypothesized that germline BAP1 mutations might influence the asbestos-induced inflammatory response that is linked to asbestos carcinogenesis, thereby increasing the risk of developing mesothelioma after minimal exposure. Using a BAP1(+/-) mouse model, we found that, compared with their wild-type littermates, BAP1(+/-) mice exposed to low-dose asbestos fibers showed significant alterations of the peritoneal inflammatory response, including significantly higher levels of pro-tumorigenic alternatively polarized M2 macrophages, and lower levels of several chemokines and cytokines. Consistent with these data, BAP1(+/-) mice had a significantly higher incidence of mesothelioma after exposure to very low doses of asbestos, doses that rarely induced mesothelioma in wild-type mice. Our findings suggest that minimal exposure to carcinogenic fibers may significantly increase the risk of malignant mesothelioma in genetically predisposed individuals carrying germline BAP1 mutations, possibly via alterations of the inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据