4.7 Article

Differential regulation of four members of the ACC synthase gene family in plum

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 59, 期 8, 页码 2009-2027

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ern056

关键词

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase ( ACS); ACS alleles; auxin; cytokinin; double sigmoid curve growth pattern; ethylene-overproducer 1 (ETO1); gibberellin; plum fruit development and ripening; system 1 and system 2 ethylene production

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulation of ACC synthase ( ACS) genes was studied in early ('Early Golden') and late ('Shiro') Japanese plum cultivars ( Prunus salicina L.) in order to determine the role of this gene family in fruit ripening. Of the four Ps-ACS cDNAs isolated, two ( PsACS1 and - 3) showed differential expression between the two cultivars. Ps-ACS1 accumulated during fruit ripening of ` Early Golden' ('EG') and ` 'Shiro' ('SH') in ethylene-dependent and - independent manners, respectively. Ps-ACS3a transcripts accumulated throughout fruit development and during 'EG' fruit ripening. Ps-ACS3b was detected only during ripening of 'SH' fruit. Furthermore, Ps-ACS3a transcript accumulation was negatively regulated by ethylene, whereas Ps-ACS3b was positively induced by the hormone. In both cultivars, the expression of Ps-ACS4 and - 5 is under positive and negative feedback control by ethylene, respectively. Genetic analyses of 'EG' and 'SH' cultivars demonstrated that 'EG' is homozygous for Ps-ACS3a whereas 'SH' is heterozygous for Ps-ACS3 (a/b). The role of ethylene-overproducer 1-like in delaying fruit ripening by interacting with Ps-ACS proteins was also studied. The effect of the plant hormones, auxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin, in regulating ethylene production by promoting the induction of the different Ps-ACS mRNAs in plum was investigated. A model is presented in which differences in Ps-ACS alleles and gene expression between early and late plums are critical in determining the ripening behaviour of the cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据