4.5 Article

Vocally correlated seasonal auditory variation in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus)

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 212, 期 23, 页码 3817-3822

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.033035

关键词

animal communication; auditory brainstem response (ABR); house sparrow; Passer domesticus; seasonal plasticity; sensory ecology

类别

资金

  1. Purdue University
  2. A. A. Lindsey Graduate Fellowship in Ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Songbirds exhibit seasonal plasticity in a broad variety of behavioral and morphological traits associated with reproduction. Changes in song production are well described while changes in song reception are not. In the present study, we test for seasonal variation in auditory processing of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus L.) using auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to tone bursts. We measured amplitude and latency of the first ABR peak in spring, summer and autumn at stimulus frequencies from 0.8 to 6.4. kHz and intensity levels from 24 to 80. dB SPL. ABR thresholds were determined at each frequency using cross-correlation. Amplitude was greater in spring than in autumn at frequencies from 3.2 to 6.4. kHz whereas latency and thresholds exhibited no seasonal variation. The results indicate an increase in the number or temporal synchrony of responses from peripheral auditory neurons during the early breeding season. Changes in peripheral auditory processing may enhance temporal coding of the fine structure and envelope of song; thereby, improving assessment of encoded information in both sexes (e. g. individual identity and dominance status) and auditory feedback during song production in males. Peripheral auditory changes may be mediated by reproductive hormones, and could involve changes in hair cell density on the basilar papilla. Our results suggest that peripheral auditory processing of songbirds changes seasonally in parallel with other behavioral and morphological traits, such as song production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据