4.5 Article

Non-linear myofilament elasticity in frog intact muscle fibres

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 212, 期 8, 页码 1115-1119

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020982

关键词

muscle fibre; striated muscle; myofilament elasticity; muscle mechanics; stiffness measurement

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council [14X-184, 14X-08664]
  2. Royal Physiographical Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present investigation was to elucidate the elastic properties of the myofilaments during tetanic activity in striated muscle. The study was carried out on intact single muscle fibres from the anterior tibialis muscle of Rana temporaria (2.0-2.5 degrees C). The instantaneous stiffness was measured as the change in force that occurred in response to a high-frequency (2-4 kHz) length oscillation while the fibre was released to shorten against a pre-set constant load that ranged between 40 and 70% of maximum tetanic force in different experiments. Measurements of fibre stiffness were carried out, at a given load, both at 2.20 mu m sarcomere length (S(2.20)), i. e. at full overlap between the thick and thin filaments, and at 2.60 mu m sarcomere length (S(2.60)). The fact that the load on the fibre was constant during the stiffness measurements at the two sarcomere lengths implies that the stiffness of elastic elements, acting in series with the myofilaments, was constant at the two sarcomere lengths. The fibre stiffness was consistently lower at the extended sarcomere length, the S(2.60)/S(2.20) ratio ranging from 0.83 to 0.97 at the different loads investigated. Based on the S(2.60)/S(2.20) ratio, the compliance of the free portions of the thick and thin filaments could be calculated. The myofilament stiffness was found to increase progressively as the load was raised from 40 to 70% of maximum tetanic force. At 2.20 mu m sarcomere length and at 40% of maximum load on the fibre, the calculated myofilament stiffness was approximately 2.5 times the maximum cross-bridge stiffness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据