4.5 Article

Involvement of lactate in glucose metabolism and glucosensing function in selected tissues of rainbow trout

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 211, 期 7, 页码 1075-1086

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.014050

关键词

rainbow trout; glucosensor; lactate; glucose homeostasis; hypothalamus; hindbrain; Brockmann bodies

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to obtain evidence in rainbow trout for a role of lactate in glucose homeostasis as well as in the function of glucosensing tissues. In a first set of experiments, trout were injected, either (1) intraperitoneally (N=8) with 5 ml kg(-1) of Cortland saline alone (control) or saline containing L-(+)-lactate (22.5 mg kg(-1) or 45 mg kg(-1)), oxamate (22.5 mg kg(-1)) or D-glucose (500 mg kg(-1)), or (2) intracerebroventricularly (N=11) with 1 mu l 100 g(-1) body mass of Cortland saline alone (control) or containing D-glucose (400 mu g mu l(-1)) or L-(+)-lactate (400 mu g mu l(-1)), with samples being obtained 6 h after treatment. In a second set of experiments, hypothalamus, hindbrain and Brockmann bodies were incubated in vitro for 1 h at 15 C in modified Hanks' medium containing 2, 4 or 8 mmol l(-1) L-(+)-lactate alone (control) or with 50 mmol l(-1) oxamate, 1 mmol l(-1) DIDS, 1 mmol l(-1) dichloroacetate, 10 mmol l(-1) 2-deoxy-D-glucose, 1 mmol l(-1) alpha-cyano-4-hydroxy cinnamate or 10 mmol l(-1) D-glucose. The response of parameters assessed (metabolite levels, enzyme activities and glucokinase expression) in tissues provided evidence for (1) a role for lactate in the regulation of glucose homeostasis through changes not only in brain regions but also in liver energy metabolism, which are further reflected in changes in plasma levels of metabolites; (2) the possible presence in trout brain of an astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle similar to that found in mammals; and (3) the lack of capacity of lactate to mimic in vitro (but not in vivo) glucose effects in fish glucosensing regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据