4.5 Article

The response of the honeybee dance to uncertain rewards

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 211, 期 21, 页码 3392-3400

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.017624

关键词

Apis mellifera; reward uncertainty; recruitment dances; risk-sensitive behaviour; reward learning

类别

资金

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focuses on the responses of dancing bees to uncertain rewards. We varied the distribution of a fixed amount of sugar solution among the several flowers of a patch and recorded the foraging and subsequent dance behaviour of single honeybees collecting such a reward at that patch. Concurrently, we aimed to minimize the well-known modulatory effects of sugar reward on both the probability and the strength of a honeybee's dance. It was under these circumstances that we conceived the honeybee dance as an autonomous information-processing system and asked whether or not such a system is sensitive to uncertainty of reward. Our results suggest that bees can tune their dancing according to the distribution of sugar reward among the several flowers of a patch, and that they seemingly do this based on the number - or the frequency - of their non-rewarding inspections to these flowers: the higher the number of non-rewarding inspections the lower the probability of dancing. As a result, a honeybee's dance appears as. risk-averse', meaning that dances for uncertain resources are less likely. Presumably, the ultimate result of having. risk-averse' dances is a colony's ability to diminish delayed rewards and the effects of competition with other flower visitors for limited resources. We conclude that a systems approach to the honeybee dance will help to further analyse the regulation of a honeybee's threshold for dancing, and that theoretical accounts of risk-sensitive' dances would prove fruitful in broader studies of honeybee foraging, particularly if one were to examine how recruitment actually translates into fitness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据