4.2 Article

Evolution of stickleback feeding behaviour: genetics of population divergence at different ontogenetic stages

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 955-962

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12103

关键词

animal personality; behavioural consistency; ontogeny; predation; nine-spined stickleback

资金

  1. Finnish Academy [250435, 128716]
  2. Universiti Putra Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolutionary significance of individual consistency in a given behaviour called animal personality has been subject to a lot of recent research. However, the genetic underpinnings of population divergence in mean personality have rarely been studied, especially across different ontogenetic stages. Previous work has shown that marine vs. pond populations of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) have undergone adaptive divergence in a series of fitness-related traits, including behaviour. One particular behavioural trait important in this system is feeding activity: giant pond sticklebacks are more active feeders than their normal sized marine conspecifics. In a common garden experiment, we raised individuals from pure and hybrid F1-generation crosses of a highly divergent marine pond population pair to see if (i) feeding activity and/or its ontogenetic change was consistent between individuals, and if (ii) population divergence at different ontogenetic stages could be explained by additive genetic, nonadditive genetic or maternal effects. We found that feeding activity decreased with age, but that these changes were consistently different among both individuals and crosses. The among cross patterns were consistent with a nonadditive genetic scenario: in the early period pond sticklebacks expressed dominance for high feeding activity, while in the late period marine sticklebacks expressed dominance for low feeding activity. We conclude that nine-spined sticklebacks exhibit different feeding personalities, and that the population divergence in feeding personality is explainable by age-dependent expression of genetic dominance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据