4.2 Article

The evolution of cranial form and function in theropod dinosaurs: insights from geometric morphometrics

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 365-377

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02427.x

关键词

biomechanics; Dinosauria; geometric morphometrics; macroevolution; mesozoic; phylogenetic comparative methods; phylogenetic eigenvector regression; Theropoda

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Columbia University
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  5. BBSRC [BB/H007954/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H007954/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1110357] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Theropod dinosaurs, an iconic clade of fossil species including Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor, developed a great diversity of body size, skull form and feeding habits over their 160+ million year evolutionary history. Here, we utilize geometric morphometrics to study broad patterns in theropod skull shape variation and compare the distribution of taxa in cranial morphospace (form) to both phylogeny and quantitative metrics of biting behaviour (function). We find that theropod skulls primarily differ in relative anteroposterior length and snout depth and to a lesser extent in orbit size and depth of the cheek region, and oviraptorosaurs deviate most strongly from the typical and ancestral theropod morphologies. Noncarnivorous taxa generally fall out in distinct regions of morphospace and exhibit greater overall disparity than carnivorous taxa, whereas large-bodied carnivores independently converge on the same region of morphospace. The distribution of taxa in morphospace is strongly correlated with phylogeny but only weakly correlated with functional biting behaviour. These results imply that phylogeny, not biting function, was the major determinant of theropod skull shape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据