4.5 Article

Demography of population recovery: survival and fidelity of peregrine falcons at various stages of population recovery

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 178, 期 2, 页码 391-401

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3168-3

关键词

Age-specific survival; Burnham model; Density dependence; Falco peregrinus; Fidelity

类别

资金

  1. International Avian Research, Austria
  2. Natural Research, UK
  3. Fulbright Colombia Program
  4. Universidad del Valle
  5. University of Florida
  6. NERC [ceh020002] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020002] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Factors influencing vital demographic rates and population dynamics can vary across phases of population growth. We studied factors influencing survival and fidelity of peregrine falcons in south Scotland-north England at two stages of population growth: when the population was recovering from pesticide-related declines and density was low, and when it had largely recovered from pesticide effects and density was high. Fidelity was higher for: adults and subadults than for juveniles, females than for males, and juveniles and adults during the low-density than during the high-density study period. Survival was age specific, with lower survival for juveniles than for older birds (juveniles, 0.600 +/- A SE 0.063; subadults, 0.811 +/- A 0.058; adults, 0.810 +/- A 0.034). Furthermore, there was some evidence that survival was generally lower for all age classes during the low-density period than during the high-density period, possibly due to a chronic, persistent effect of organochlorine pesticides as the population recovered. Evidence for a density-dependent effect on survival was weak, but a negative effect of density on fidelity of juveniles (dispersing age class) during the recovery phase suggests density-dependent dispersal when the population was increasing. Our results show how population density can influence demographic parameters differently and how such influences can vary across phases of population growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据