4.1 Article

Invalidation of Hyperamoeba by Transferring its Species to Other Genera of Myxogastria

期刊

JOURNAL OF EUKARYOTIC MICROBIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 189-196

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00466.x

关键词

Amoebozoa; molecular phylogeny; Mycetozoa; Myxomycetes; slime molds; SSU rRNA gene

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust [R1008101]
  2. Royal Society International Joint Project
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C510975/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genus Hyperamoeba Alexeieff, 1923 was established to accommodate an aerobic amoeba exhibiting three life stagesamoeba, flagellate, and cyst. As more species/strains were isolated, it became increasingly evident from small subunit (SSU) gene phylogenies and ultrastructure that Hyperamoeba is polyphyletic and its species occupy different positions within the class Myxogastria. To pinpoint Hyperamoeba strains within other myxogastrid genera we aligned numerous myxogastrid sequences: whole small subunit ribosomal (SSU or 18S rRNA) gene for 50 dark-spored (i.e. Stemonitida and Physarida) Myxogastria (including a new Hyperamoeba''/Didymium sequence) and a similar to 400-bp SSU fragment for 147 isolates assigned to 10 genera of the order Physarida. Phylogenetic analyses show unambiguously that the type species Hyperamoeba flagellata is a Physarum (Physarum flagellatum comb. nov.) as it nests among other Physarum species as robust sister to Physarum didermoides. Our trees also allow the following allocations: five Hyperamoeba strains to the genus Stemonitis; Hyperamoeba dachnaya, Pseudodidymium cryptomastigophorum, and three other Hyperamoeba strains to the genus Didymium; and two further Hyperamoeba strains to the family Physaridae. We therefore abandon the polyphyletic and redundant genus Hyperamoeba. We discuss the implications for the ecology and evolution of Myxogastria, whose amoeboflagellates are more widespread than previous inventories supposed, being now found in freshwater and even marine environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据