4.7 Article

Matrine attenuates allergic airway inflammation and eosinophil infiltration by suppressing eotaxin and Th2 cytokine production in asthmatic mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 151, 期 1, 页码 470-477

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.065

关键词

Asthma; Cytokine; Eosinophil; Eotaxin; Matrine

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG1A0071-2, CMRPF1C0031]
  2. Chang Gung University of Science and Technology [EZRPF3C0101, EZRPF3C0111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Matrine has been isolated from Sophora flavescens, and found to show anti-inflammatory effects in macrophages and anti-cachectic effects in hepatomas. The present study investigated whether matrine suppressed eosinophil infiltration and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in mice, and decreased the inflammatory response of tracheal epithelial cells. Materials and methods: BALB/c mice were sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin to induce allergic asthma in mice. These asthmatic mice were given various doses of matrine by intraperitoneal injection. Additionally, activated human tracheal epithelial cells (BEAS-2B cells) were treated with matrine, and evaluated for levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Results: We found that matrine significantly decreased AHR, and suppressed goblet cell hyperplasia, eosinophil infiltration, and inflammatory response in the lung tissue of asthmatic mice. Matrine also reduced the levels of Th2 cytokines and chemokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and suppressed OVA-IgE production in serum. Furthermore, matrine treatment of activated BEAS-2B cells decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines and eotaxins, as well as suppressed ICAM-1 expression and thus adhesion of eosinophils to inflammatory BEAS-2B cells in vitro. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that matrine can improve allergic asthma in mice, and therefore has potential therapeutic potential in humans. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据