4.7 Article

Anti-mycobacterial diynes from the Canadian medicinal plant Aralia nudicaulis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 140, 期 1, 页码 141-144

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.12.048

关键词

Antimycobacterial; Aralia nudicaulis; Falcarinol; Panaxydol; Polyacetylenes; Mycobacterium tuberculosis

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. New Brunswick Health Research Foundation
  3. Harrison McCain Foundation
  4. Horizon Health Network
  5. UNB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Aralia nudicaulis, or wild sarsaparilla, is used as a traditional medicinal plant for the treatment of various illnesses by many of the Canadian First Nations. Iroquois and Algonquin First Nations of Eastern Canada use a tea prepared from dried Aralia nudicaulis rhizome as a cough medicine and for the treatment of tuberculosis. Previous investigations of aqueous extracts of Aralia nudicaulis rhizomes have shown it to possess antimycobacterial activity. Aim of the study: To isolate and identify antimycobacterial constituents from Aralia nudicaulis rhizomes. Materials and methods: Methanolic extracts of Aralia nudicaulis rhizomes were subjected to bioassay guided fractionation using the microplate resazurin assay (MRA) to assess inhibitory activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra. The antimycobacterial constituents were identified by NMR, MS and polarimetry. Results: Two C17 polyacetylenes with significant antimycobacterial activity were isolated from the Aralia nudicaulis rhizome extract. The polyacetylenes were identified as (3R)-falcarinol and (3R, 9R, 10S)-panaxydol. Falcarinol and panaxydol displayed MICs of 25.6 mu M and 36.0 mu M and IC(50)s of 15.3 mu M and 23.5 mu M against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. Conclusions: Falcarinol and panaxydol were identified as the principal constituents responsible for the antimycobacterial activity of Aralia nudicaulis rhizomes validating an ethnopharmacological use of this plant by the Canadian First Nations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据