4.7 Article

Preliminary study of antidiabetic activity of the methanolic leaf extract of Axonopus compressus (P. Beauv) in alloxan-induced diabetic rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 138, 期 3, 页码 713-716

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.10.009

关键词

Alloxan monohydrate; Diabetes mellitus; Axonopus compressus; Blood glucose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Axonopus Compressus is commonly used by the people of Southern Nigeria to treat different ailment such as common cold and diabetes. This study therefore, evaluated the anti-diabetic effect of the methanolic leaf extract of the plant. Materials and methods: Diabetes was induced in the rats by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of alloxan monohydrate at the dose of 180 mg/kg. Three test doses of the extract (250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg) administered per as through gastric gavage to the rats were used in the study. The activity was compared to a standard reference drug (glibenclamide, 2 mg/kg) and a negative control. Blood from the tail snip was used to measure the effects of the extract and drug at 0, 1, 3 and 6 h using autoanalyzer (AccuCheck Active (R)) glucose kit. Results: Methanolic leaf extract of Axonopus cornpressus at all the doses (250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg) used caused a respective time dependent and significant (p < 0.0001) reduction (by 31.5%, 19.8% and 24.5%) of the blood glucose levels in the diabetic rats when compared to the negative control group at the 6th hour. However, the reference drug (glibenclamide, 2 mg/kg) decreased the blood glucose levels by 69.9% and the tween 20 solution (negative control) increased the blood glucose level by 15.2% at the 6th hour. Moreso, the extract at the different test doses caused various degrees of reduction of the blood glucose levels of the test rats at 1st, 3rd and 6th hours when compared to the negative control rats. Conclusion: The findings suggest that Axonopus cornpressus may possess antidiabetic property. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据