4.7 Article

Anti-allergic activity of German chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) in mast cell mediated allergy model

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 137, 期 1, 页码 336-340

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.05.029

关键词

Chamomile; Allergic reactions; Compound 48/80; Histamine; Mast cells; Tea

资金

  1. Department of Pharmacology, H.S.K. College of Pharmacy, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Chamomile is most popular used medicinal plant and extensively consumed as a tea or tisanes. Traditionally this plant was used for treatment of many ailments such as allergy disorders and inflammatory mediated diseases. Aim of the study: We investigated the effects of anti-allergic activity of Matricaria recutita L on mast cell mediated allergic models. Materials and methods: The protective effect of methanol extract of Matricaria recutita against compound 48/80 induced anaphylaxis and pruritis models for acute phase of hypersensitivity reactions were carried Out. The late phase hypersensitivity reactions by compound 48/80 induced mast cell degranulation and histamine release from blood along with serum nitric oxide (NO), rat peritoneal fluid nitric oxide (NO) and bronchoalveolar fluid nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured. Results: The methanol extract of Matricaria recutita L. showed inhibitory effects on anaphylaxis induced by compound 48/80 and significant dose dependent anti-pruritis property was observed by inhibiting the mast cell degranulation. Mast cell membrane stabilization activity was also observed in compound 48/80 induced mast cell activation. Dose dependent reduction in the histamine release, along with decreased release of serum, rat peritoneal and BAL fluid nitric oxide (NO) levels were observed. Conclusion: These results suggest that the methanol extract of Matricaria recutita showed potent anti-allergic activity by inhibition of histamine release from mast cells. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据