4.7 Article

In vitro anti-HIV activity of five selected South African medicinal plant extracts

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 124, 期 2, 页码 182-188

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.04.043

关键词

Bulbine alooides; Crinum macowani; HIV; Hypoxis sobolifera; Leonotis leonurus; Tulbaghia violacea

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [2069228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim of the study: Five South African medicinal plants, Bulbine alooides (L.) Willd. (Asphodelaceae), Crinum macowani Baker (Amaryllidaceae), Hypoxis sobolifera var. sobolifera (Jacq.) Nel (Hypoxidaceae) Leonotis, leonurus (L.) R.Br. (Lamiaceae) and Tulbaghia violacea Harv (Liliaceae) used for the treatment of various ailments, including infectious diseases, were screened for activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Materials and methods: Aqueous and ethanol extracts were tested for inhibitory activity in HIV-1 infected CEM.NKR-CCR5 cells, and against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and HIV-1 protease (PR). Results: In CEM.NKR-CCR5 cells, ethanol extracts of Leonotis leonurus inhibited HIV-1 significantly (33% reduction in HIV-1 p24, P < 0.05). HIV-1 RT inhibition ( >= 50%) was shown for extracts of Bulbine alooides (aqueous and ethanol), Hypoxis sobolifera (aqueous and ethanol) and Leonotis leonurus (aqueous) but, inhibitory activity was lost upon dereplication for removal of non-specific tannins/polysaccharides. HIV-1 PR inhibition was observed for extracts of Hypoxis sobolifera (aqueous), Bulbine alooides (aqueous and ethanol) and Leonotis leonurus (ethanol). Only ethanolic extracts of Bulbine alooides and Leonotis leonurus retained HIV-1 PR inhibition after dereplication with IC50 of 94 mu g/ml and 120 mu g/ml, respectively. Conclusion: The dereplicated ethanolic extracts of Leonotis leonurus and Bulbine alooides showed the greatest anti-HIV potential in this study through inhibition of HIV-1 PR. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据