4.7 Article

Therapeutic effects of daphnetin on adjuvant-induced arthritic rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 259-263

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.08.031

关键词

Daphnelin; Adjuvant arthritic; IL-1; TNF-alpha; MIF

资金

  1. State Ministry and Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim of this study: Daphnetin was regarded as the mark compound for quality control of Zushima-Pian, a traditional Chinese medicine tablet for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, no in vivo study oil the therapeutic effects of daphnetin for RA has been reported. Materials and methods: The adjuvant arthritic (AA) rat model was developed to evaluate the anti-arthritic effects of daphnetin. After immunized with Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA), the rats were treated with daphnetin (2.25 and 4 5 mg/kg) for three weeks. We determined the change of secondary paw swelling and the arthritis scores of these tested rats. The severity of arthritis in the knee joints was evaluated by histological assessment of cartilage destruction. The levels of IL-1, TNF-alpha and MIF in the serum were measured by ELISA. Results and conclusions: Our results Showed that daphnetin significantly reduced paw swelling and decreased the arthritis scores. The pathological examination demonstrated that articular cartilage degeneration with synovial hyperplasia and inflammatory cells infiltration in AA rats were Suppressed by daphnetin. There was significant reduction ill production of interleukin-1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and macrophage migration inhibitory Factor (MIF) in serum of AA rats treated with daphnetin except the low dose group (2.25 mg/kg) on TNF-alpha. In conclusion, we demonstrates that daphnetin is highly effective on preventing and suppressing the development and progression of adjuvant-induced arthritis and provides direct evidences that daphnetin is one of the active principle of Zushima-Pian for treating rheumatoid arthritis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据