4.7 Review

Buckling characteristics of a circular toroidal shell with stiffened ribs

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 325-335

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.005

关键词

Toroidal shell; Steel model; Experiment; Nonlinear FEM; Failure mode

资金

  1. Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. China 'Theoretical and Experimental Research about Structure of Pressure Toroidal Shell in Underwater Engineering' [51109190]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 'Structural Reliability Analysis on the Spherical Hull of Deepsea Manned Submersibles' [51439004]
  4. Scientific Innovation Program Project 'Key Technology Research and experimental validation of deep manned submersible' by the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [14DZ1205500, 14DZ2250900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ring-stiffened toroidal shell is entirely different from the traditional ring-stiffened cylindrical and spherical shells. It has special structurally beneficial characteristics for underwater engineering. A whole welding steel toroidal model with the ring-stiffened ribs has been manufactured, tested until collapse in pressure chamber and analyzed by nonlinear finite element analyses (FEAs). Then the essential cause and collapse mode of this tested ring-stiffened toroidal model have been studied comprehensively by nonlinear FE method. The experimental and numerical results both reveal that the initial geometric imperfection would mainly determine the model's final failure mode, critical pressure and collapse deformation. Further parametric study is made to study the budding property of ring-stiffened toroidal shell, including failure mode and critical pressure loading by varying the structural parameters. This investigation will lay a good foundation for deriving a theoretical solution for the budding of ring-stiffened toroidal shell in the near future. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据