4.6 Article

Maternal drinking water arsenic exposure and perinatal outcomes in Inner Mongolia, China

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.084392

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency and the Inner Mongolia Center for Endemic Disease Control and Research in Inner Mongolia, China [R-82808401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Bayingnormen is a region located in western Inner Mongolia China, with a population that is exposed to a wide range of drinking water arsenic concentrations. The relationship between maternal drinking water arsenic exposure and perinatal endpoints ( term birth weight, preterm birth, stillbirth and neonatal death) in this region was evaluated in this study. Methods An analysis was conducted of all singleton deliveries in a defined geographical area of Inner Mongolia from December 1996 to December 1999 (n = 9890). Outcome and covariate data were abstracted from prenatal care records. Exposure was based on well-water measures for the maternal subvillage. Mean birth weight at term was compared across four arsenic categories using analysis of covariance. ORs for stillbirth, preterm birth and neonatal death were estimated by logistic regression with arsenic exposure dichotomised at 50 mu g/l. Results Term birth weight was 0.05 kg higher (95% CI 0.02 to 0.08) in the highest exposure category (>100 mu g/l) compared to the reference ( below limit of detection to 20 mu g/l). Arsenic > 50 mu g/l was associated with an increased risk of neonatal death (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.59). No relationship was found between maternal arsenic exposure and preterm or stillbirth delivery. Conclusions At the levels observed in our study, arsenic does not appear to contribute to adverse birth outcomes. Exposure may play a role in neonatal death; however, the neonatal death rate in this population was low and this potential association merits further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据