4.2 Article

Concentration and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalic acid esters in the surface water of the Yangtze River Delta, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 335-342

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60782-1

关键词

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; phthalic acid esters; Yangtze River Delta; surface water

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB421602]
  2. Water Pollution Control and Treatment Special Project [2009ZX07527-001]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology [KF2010-20]
  4. Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry on Environmental Protection [2009467109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pollution from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phthalic acid esters (PAEs) in the surface water of the rapidly urbanized Yangtze River Delta region was investigated. Fourteen surface water samples were collected in June 2010. Water samples were liquid-liquid extracted using methylene chloride and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Concentrations of PAHs and PAEs ranged 12.9-638.1 ng/L and 61-28550 ng/L, respectively. Fluoranthene, naphthalene, pyrene, phenanthrene, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, and di-n-butyl phthalate were the most abundant compounds in the samples. The water samples were moderately polluted with benzo[a]pyrene according to China's environmental quality standard for surface water. The two highest concentrations of PAHs and PAEs occurred in samples from Taihu Lake, Wuxi City and the western section of Yangchenghu Lake. Potential sources of pollution at S7 were petroleum combustion and the plastics industry, and at Yangchenghu Lake were petroleum combustion and domestic waste. Pollution in samples from the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal originated from diesel engines. There were no obvious sources of pollution for the other water samples. These results can be used as reference levels for future monitoring programs of pollution from PAHs and PAEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据