4.2 Article

Seasonal variation of potential denitrification rates of surface sediment from Meiliang Bay, Taihu Lake, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 961-967

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60205-9

关键词

denitrification; sediment; environmental factors; Taihu Lake

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2008CB418105]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40730528, 40901253]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2009333]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [CXNIGLAS200804]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulatory effects of environmental factors on denitrification were studied in the sediments of Meiliang Bay, Taihu Lake, in a monthly sampling campaign over a one-year period. Denitrification rates were measured in slurries of field samples and enrichment experiments using the acetylene inhibition technique. Sediment denitrification rates in inner bay and outer bay ranged from 2.8 to 51.5 nmol N-2/(g dw (dry weight).hr) and from 1.5 to 81.1 nmol N-2/(g dw.hr), respectively. Sediment denitrification rates were greatest in the spring and lowest in the summer and early autumn, due primarily to seasonal differences in nitrate concentration and water temperature. For each site, positive and linear relationships were regularly observed between denitrification rate and water column nitrate concentration. Of various environmental factors on denitrification that we assessed, nitrate was determined to be the key factor limiting denitrification rates in the sediments of Meiliang Bay. In addition, at the two sites denitrification rates were also regulated by temperature. The addition of organic substrates had no significant effect on denitrification rate, indicating that sediment denitrification was not limited by organic carbon availability in the sediments. Nitrate in the water column was depleted during summer and early autumn, and this suppressed effective removal of nitrogen from Taihu Lake by denitrification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据