4.2 Article

Effects of plant species coexistence on soil enzyme activities and soil microbial community structure under Cd and Pb combined pollution

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1040-1048

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60215-1

关键词

ecological dose; enzyme activities; DNA; RAPD; heavy metal

资金

  1. Science Foundation of Shanghai [07DZ12055, 07DZ19604, 08d21900404]
  2. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program (863) of China [2007AA10Z441]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between plant species coexistence and soil microbial communities under heavy metal pollution has attracted much attention in ecology. However, whether plant species coexistence could offset the impacts of heavy metal combined pollution on soil microbial community structure and soil enzymes activities is not well studied. The modified ecological dose model and PCR-RAPD method were used to assess the effects of two plant species coexistence on soil microbial community and enzymes activities subjected to Cd and Pb combined stress. The results indicated that monoculture and mixed culture would increased microbe populations under Cd and Pb combined stress, and the order of sensitivity of microbial community responding to heavy metal stress was: actinomycetes > bacteria > fungi. The respirations were significantly higher in planted soil than that in unplanted soil. The plant species coexistence could enhance soil enzyme activities under Cd and Pb combined. Furthermore, planted soil would be helpful to enhance soil genetic polymorphisms, but Cd and Pb pollution would cause a decrease on soil genetic polymorphisms. Mixed culture would increase the ecological dose 50% (ED50) values, and the ED50 values for soil enzyme activities decreased with increasing culture time. The dehydrogenase was most sensitive to metal addition and easily loses activity under low dose of heavy metal. However, it was difficult to fully inhibit the phoshpatase activity, and urease responded similarly with phosphatase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据