4.2 Article

Degradation kinetics and estrogenic activity of 17-estradiol removal by aqueous manganese dioxide

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934521003772329

关键词

Hydrous MnO2; 17-estradiol; oxidation; kinetics; estrogenic activity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Y506237]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2008F70014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural and synthetic hormones have emerged as a new group of contaminants in soil and water systems. To better understand the processes affecting these compounds in soils and sediments, the kinetics of 17-estradiol (E2) transformation by hydrous manganese oxide (-MnO2 were investigated as a function of reactant concentration, MnO2 concentration, pH and the presence of co-solutes. The reaction of E2 degradation by -MnO2 did not exhibit simple pseudo-first-order kinetics, although a good linear fit (R2 = 0.97) was obtained during the first 30 min, which was indicative of pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics in the first stage. The initial reaction rate (rinit) values of E2 degradation were enhanced with increasing E2, MnO2 and H+ concentration. The reaction orders for E2, MnO2 and H+ concentrations were 0.80, 0.72 and 0.07, respectively. The presence of metal ions and carboxylic acids had an inhibitory effect on rinit as a result of the decreased number of active surface sites in the presence of co-solutes. The same inhibitory effect on rinit was also observed in wastewater. Furthermore, the results showed that -MnO2 not only degraded E2 but also removed 62% and 48% of the estrogenic activity originating from E2 in ultrapure water and wastewater, respectively. This study demonstrated that natural manganese oxides in soils and sediments are likely to promote appreciable degradation of E2, and that reaction rates are strongly dependent on solution conditions. However, a combination of methods should be adopted in order to completely remove the estrogenic activity of E2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据