4.4 Article

Relationship between the adsorption species of cesium and radiocesium interception potential in soils and minerals: an EXAFS study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 92-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.08.009

关键词

RIP; Cesium; Soil; EXAFS; Adsorption; Species

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [24110008 (2012-2016)]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26257402, 22224011, 24110008] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the radiocesium (RCs) interception potential (RIP), cation exchange capacity (CEC), total organic carbon (TOC) content, and adsorption species in soils and minerals by using extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. The RIP related to Cs+ adsorption by frayed-edge site (FES) has often been used to measure the mobility and bioavailability of RCs in the environment. This study found that the presence of organic matter (OM) can reduce RIP to a certain extent. The adsorption amount (=Q(T)) in soil was obviously correlated to RIP at a small [Cs+] region, whereas a linear relationship between Q(T) and CEC was observed at a large [Cs+] region. Both the inner-sphere (IS) and outer-sphere (OS) complexes of Cs+ were observed through EXAFS at a molecular scale. The linear correlation between log (RIP/CEC) and the ratio of the coordination number (CN) of IS (=CNIS) and OS (=CNOS) complexes noted as CNIS/(CNIS + CNOS) suggested that the ratio of CN is very sensitive to Cs+ adsorption species with variable RIP and CEC. The adsorption species of Cs+ in soil was mainly dependent on the clay mineral content of soil. RIP was affected not only by FES but also by other strong adsorption sites, such as the interlayers and cavities identified as the IS complex in EXAFS analysis. Findings indicated that the EMES approach is a powerful and efficient tool to explore the behavior of Cs+ in a given environment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据