4.4 Article

Rapid removal of uranium from aqueous solutions using magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 composite particles

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 40-46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.11.003

关键词

Uranium(VI); Magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 composite particles; Sorption isotherm; Kinetics; Desorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20901080, 11079006]
  2. The Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-N50-3, KJCX2-YW-N49-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid removal of U(VI) from aqueous solutions was investigated using magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 composite particles as the novel adsorbent. Batch experiments were conducted to study the effects of initial pH, amount of adsorbent, shaking time and initial U(VI) concentrations on uranium sorption efficiency as well as the desorbing of U(VI). The sorption of uranium on Fe3O4@SiO2 composite particles was pHdependent, and the optimal pH was 6.0. In kinetics studies, the sorption equilibrium can be reached within 180 min, and the experimental data were well fitted by the pseudo-second-order model, and the equilibrium sorption capacities calculated by the model were almost the same as those determined by experiments. The Langmuir sorption isotherm model correlates well with the uranium sorption equilibrium data for the concentration range of 20-200 mg/L. The maximum uranium sorption capacity onto magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 composite particles was estimated to be about 52 mg/g at 25 degrees C. The highest values of uranium desorption (98%) was achieved using 0.01 M HCl as the desorbing agent. Fe(3)o(4)@SiO2 composite particles showed a good selectivity for uranium from aqueous solution with other interfering cation ions. Present study suggested that magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 composite particles can be used as a potential adsorbent for sorption uranium and also provided a simple, fast separation method for removal of heavy metal ion from aqueous solution. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据