4.4 Article

Investigating incorporation and distribution of radionuclides in trinitite

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
卷 102, 期 9, 页码 852-862

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.05.003

关键词

Trinitite; Autoradiography; Fallout; Radioactive contamination; Nuclear weapon test; Desert glasses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the surface explosions in nuclear tests have released radioactivity to the environment in the form of bulk glassy materials originating from the melting of sandy soil in the neighbourhood of ground zero. In view of clarifying issues concerning the mechanism of formation and the radiological impact of these materials, we investigated incorporation and volume distribution of radionuclides in a typical fragment of trinitite, the glassy substance generated following the first nuclear test (Trinity Site, New Mexico, 1945). Specific activities were determined by gamma-spectrometry for the most significant fission and activation products. In particular, (152)Eu activity was used to estimate the original point of collection of the sample with respect to ground zero. After embedding in an epoxy resin, the sample was then sliced to perform cross-sectional beta- and alpha-autoradiograph. alpha-spectrometry was also carried out on a fine powder obtained by surface abrasion. In the beta-autoradiography, hot spots were distinguishable in the proximity of the blast side, over a 1000 times less intense background of sand activation products. Also a-contamination (from (239+240)Pu and (241)Am) was mostly concentrated within the superficial layer, in a fraction of only 20% of the overall volume of the sample, exhibiting a discontinuous, droplet-like distribution. This evidence would partially support a recent hypothesis on trinitite formation according to which most of the glass layer was formed not on the ground but by a rain of material injected into the fireball that melted, fell back, and collected on a bed of already fused sand. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据