4.4 Article

14CO2 dispersion around two PWR nuclear power plants in Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
卷 100, 期 7, 页码 574-580

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.03.022

关键词

Atmospheric air; C-14; Nuclear power plant; PWR; Dispersion; Gaussian plume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric air samples were taken within 3 km from power plants encompassing five different distances and wind directions. Samples were taken between 2002 and 2005 aiming to evaluate the environmental C-14 enrichment due to the operation of Brazilian nuclear power plants. The sampling system consisted of a pump connected to a trapping column filled with a 3 M NaOH solution. The trapped C-14 by using a single stage accelerator mass spectrometry (SSAMS). CO2 was analyzed for All sampling sites revealed measurable C-14 excess values. The maximum excesses were of 15 and 14 mBq/m(3) for sampling sites placed at NE of the power plants, which is the main wind direction in the area. The mean excesses values were 12 mBq/m(3) to the NE direction, 8 mBq/m to the E, 10 mBq/m to the N, 8 mBq/m(3) to the WNW and 7 mBq/m(3) to the W direction (increasing distances from NE to W). Compared to other Light Water Reactors (LWR) data, these means' values are significantly higher than the average worldwide reported value of 3 mBq/m(3). Available data indicate that the observed values are not related to C-14 emission by the power plants vent stack. Other factors, such as topography, seem to have an important role because it affects wind dispersion thus favoring C-14 accumulation in the sampled area. Moreover, the high elevations around the power plants enhance the chances to measure high values of C-14 since the plume can be intercepted before it is drawn to the ground. Modeling of the plume has shown that its dispersion does not follow a Gaussian model and that agreement between atmospheric CO2 and vegetation C-14 activities occurs only for sampling sites placed at NE of the power plants. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据