4.4 Article

Comparative study of natural radioactivity levels in soil samples from the Upper Siwaliks and Punjab, India using gamma-ray spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 94-98

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.09.011

关键词

Natural radioactivity; Gamma-ray spectrometry; HPGe detector; Re-eq activities; Annual effective dose; External health index

资金

  1. Inter University Accelerator Center, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural radioactive materials under certain conditions can reach hazardous radiological levels. So, it becomes necessary to study the natural radioactivity levels in soil to assess the dose for the population in order to know the health risks and to have a baseline for future changes in the environmental radioactivity due to human activities. The natural radionuclide (Ra-216. Th-232, and K-40) contents in soil were determined for 26 locations around the Upper Siwaliks of Kala Amb, Nahan and Morni Hills, Northern India, using high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometric analysis. It was observed that the concentration of natural radionuclides viz., Ra-226, Th-212 and K-40, in the soil varies from 28.3 +/- 0.5 to 81.0 +/- 1.7 Bq kg(-1), 61.2 +/- 1.3 to 140.3 +/- 2.6 Bq kg(-1) and 363.4 +/- 4.9 to 1002.2 +/- 11.2 Bq kg(-1) respectively. The total absorbed dose rate calculated from activity concentration of Ra-226, Th-232 and K-40 ranged from 71.1 to 162.0 nGy h(-1). The radium equivalent (R-eq) and the external hazard index (H-ex), which resulted from the natural radionuclides in soil, were also calculated and found to vary from 149.4 to 351.8 Bq kg(-1) and from 0.40 to 0.95 respectively. These values in Upper Siwaliks area were compared with that from the adjoining areas of Punjab. The radium equivalent activities in all the soil samples were lower than the limit (370 Bq kg(-1)) set in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) report and the dose equivalent was within the safe limit of 1 mSv y(-1). (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据