4.4 Article

Use of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool to Scale Sediment Delivery from Field to Watershed in an Agricultural Landscape with Topographic Depressions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 9-17

出版社

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2011.0340

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Park Service
  2. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
  3. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
  4. Minnesota Environment and Natural History Trust Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For two watersheds in the northern Midwest United States, we show that landscape depressions have a significant impact on watershed hydrology and sediment yields and that the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has appropriate features to simulate these depressions. In our SWAT models of the Willow River in Wisconsin and the Sunrise River in Minnesota, we used Pond and Wetland features to capture runoff from about 40% of the area in each watershed. These depressions trapped considerable sediment, yet further reductions in sediment yield were required for calibration and achieved by reducing the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) cropping-practice (P) factor to 0.40 to 0.45. We suggest terminology to describe annual sediment yields at different conceptual spatial scales and show how SWAT output can be partitioned to extract data at each of these scales. These scales range from plot-scale yields calculated with the USLE to watershed-scale yields measured at the outlet. Intermediate scales include field, upland, pre-riverine, and riverine scales, in descending order along the conceptual flow path from plot to outlet. Sediment delivery ratios, when defined as watershed-scale yields as a percentage of plot-scale yields, ranged from 1% for the Willow watershed (717 km(2)) to 7% for the Sunrise watershed (991 km(2)). Sediment delivery ratios calculated from published relations based on watershed area alone were about 5 to 6%, closer to pre-riverine-scale yields in our watersheds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据