4.4 Article

Effectiveness of Unfertilized Buff er Strips for Reducing Nitrogen Loads from Agricultural Lowland to Surface Waters

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 322-333

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0545

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economy, Agriculture and Innovation (ELI) [BO-12-07-009-002]
  2. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unfertilized buff er strips (BS) are widely accepted to reduce nitrogen (N) loads from agricultural land to surface water. However, the relative reduction of N load or concentration (BS eff ectiveness, BSE), varies with management and local conditions, especially hydrogeology. We present novel experimental evidence on BSE for 5-m-wide grass BS on intensively drained and managed plain agricultural lowland with varying hydrogeology. We selected characteristic sites for fi ve major hydrogeological classes of the Netherlands and installed paired 5-m-wide unfertilized grass (BS) and reference (REF) treatments along the ditch. Th e REF was managed like the adjacent fi eld, and BS was only harvested. Treatments were equipped with reservoirs in the ditch to collect and measure discharge and fl ow proportional N concentration for 3 or 4 yr. In addition, N concentration in upper groundwater was measured. We found a statistically signifi cant BSE of 10% on the peat site. At the other sites, BSE for N was low and statistically insignifi cant. Low BSE was explained by denitrifi cation between adjacent fi eld and ditch, as well as by the site-specifi c hydrologic factors including low proportion of shallow groundwater fl ow, downward seepage, low residence time in the BS, and surface runoff away from the ditch. We emphasize that a REF treatment is needed to evaluate BSE in agriculture and recommend reservoirs if drainage patterns are unknown. Introduction of a 5-m-wide BS is ineff ective for mitigating N loads from lowland agriculture to surface waters. We expect more from BS specifi cally designed to abate surface runoff

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据