4.0 Article

Determination of atrazine in surface waters by combination of POCIS passive sampling and ELISA detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 2582-2587

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1em10112a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [2B08036]
  2. infrastructural projects of the European Regional Development Fund [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0001, CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0006-ED00060101, CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polar organic compound integrative samplers (POCIS) in combination with instrumental techniques such as LC-MS-MS were previously used to monitor environmental pollutants but the performance of alternative immunochemical methods such as ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) has been explored less. In the present study, POCIS technology was applied to surface water sampling in the Czech Republic, and ELISA was used as a detection technique for the herbicide atrazine. In the first study, 28 samples from streams around small municipal waste water treatment plants (WWTPs) were collected using two different devices (POCISpest and POCISpharm) over the course of 21 days. Elevated atrazine concentrations (up to 25 ng per POCIS) were found in samples down-stream of WWTPs. This observation was also confirmed in another two year study (4 sampling periods) investigating 7 river sites around a major city of Brno as well as the inlet and outlet of the city's WWTP. High atrazine levels were systematically determined at the outlet from the WWTPs (120-605 ng per POCIS). A decreasing trend in the atrazine concentrations in rivers around the city of Brno has been observed, with the highest levels observed within the first sampling period in spring 2007 (100-600 ng per POCIS, with an extreme value of 2760 ng per POCIS). Results of the atrazine ELISA were closely correlated with LC-MS/MS, which confirmed good applicability of ELISA as a cost-effective screening tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据