4.0 Article

Determination of toxic and essential elements in children's blood with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 1226-1232

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b809465a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have suggested that low blood lead level, less than 50 mu g L-1, can influence the neurobehavioral performance of children. In addition, nutritional deficiencies in some essential elements may increase the toxicity of lead, and some essential elements may influence the blood concentrations of lead and other toxic metals. These findings, coupled with the scarcity of available data on some elements in children's blood and the introduction of methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) to gasoline, accentuate the need to monitor the concentrations of lead, manganese, and other heavy metals and essential elements in children's blood. This study reports on the multi-element analysis of blood of South African school children using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The sample preparation consisted of a nitric acid/hydrogen peroxide open digestion and subsequent dilution with MilliQ water. The accuracy and precision were evaluated from quintuplet analyses of Seronorm (TM) trace elements whole blood reference material and human blood samples. Concentrations of lead, arsenic, manganese, copper, zinc, selenium, cobalt, and chromium in the blood of South African school children were determined. The average values were: lead 56.4 mu g L-1, arsenic 1.53 mu g L-1, manganese 8.48 mu g L-1, copper 1195 mg L-1, zinc 3431 mu g L-1, selenium 176 mu g L-1, cobalt 0.80 mu g L-1, and chromium 1.25 mu g L-1. The level of lead was in line with some reported lower concentrations. The concentrations of arsenic and manganese were generally lower than those found in the literature. The concentrations of cobalt, copper, selenium, and chromium were higher than those found in other studies, whereas that of zinc was lower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据