4.7 Article

Efficient bioconversion of organic wastes to value-added chemicals by soaking, black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) and anaerobic fermentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 267-276

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.084

关键词

Corncob; Restaurant wastewater; Black soldier fly; Anaerobic fermentation; Bioconversion; Bioenergy

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China [2013PY061]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest, China [201303094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corncob degradation is an issue that needs to be address for it to be further utilized as bioenergy. We explored a new comprehensive degradation strategy for corncob. First, restaurant wastewater was used to improve the corncob biochemical characteristics and partly degrade the lignocelluloses. After the restaurant wastewater treatment, the residue was converted using black soldier fly larvae (BSFL), and the supernatant was utilized for biogas production by anaerobic fermentation. The highest product rates of glucose, xylose, and arabinose were obtained at the optimal corncob soaking condition at 75 degrees C, 5 h, and 60 g/L from lignocellulose. The soaking residue was converted using BSFL for 10 days, and 24.34% grease yield was extracted. The soaking residue can be utilized by BSFL and produce grease, which is similar to other wastes such as rice straw and pig manure. The corncob soaking supernatant was utilized for biogas production by anaerobic fermentation. The degradation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin reached about 27.34%, 45.14%, and 29.33%, respectively. A total of 500 mL supernatant mixed with 30% anaerobic sludge under 35 +/- 2 degrees C produced about 7.52 L of biogas with about 3.22 L methane. In conclusion, the above comprehensive process can effectively degrade lignocellulose in corncob and obtain two bioenergy products, namely insect grease and biogas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据