4.7 Article

Modeling shrub encroachment in subalpine grasslands under different environmental and management scenarios

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 160-169

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.038

关键词

Mountain grasslands; Echinospartum horridum; Erizon; Grazing; Land abandonment; Lattice-structured model; Pyrenees; Woody encroachment

资金

  1. Spanish Science and Innovation Ministry (PN-MICINN) [CGL2008-00655/BOS]
  2. Spanish Environmental Ministry [MMAMRM 002/2007]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Woody plants are spreading in many alpine and subalpine ecosystems and are expected to continue increasing in response to land abandonment and global warming. This encroachment threatens species diversity, and considerable efforts have been deployed to control it. In this study, we combined a lattice model and field data to investigate the efficiency of different management strategies in controlling shrub encroachment in alpine grasslands. The model parameter values were estimated in the field based on the thorny shrub Echinospartum horridum (erizon) which is currently encroaching in central Spanish Pyrenees. Our study shows that encroachment could accelerate if climate warming continues. Different management scenarios consisting of a gradient of livestock pressures, fire events and mechanical removal were simulated to identify scenarios able to control the expansion of shrubs into grasslands. Our study shows that grazing alone cannot stop encroachment. Rather, a combination of grazing and shrub removal (either by fire or mechanical removal) is needed, and our model can help estimate the frequency and intensities of the shrub removal. This model can be used to investigate the consequences of different management scenarios and environmental variability which could be of practical value in the preservation of alpine grasslands. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据