4.6 Article

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Evapotranspiration Using Satellite Remote Sensing Data: A Case Study in the Gezira Scheme, Sudan

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 86-92

出版社

INT SOC ENVIRON INFORM SCI
DOI: 10.3808/jei.200900143

关键词

evapotranspiration; irrigation performance; Gezira scheme; remote sensing; SEBAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current methods for estimating evapotranspiration (ET), the essential variable in irrigation performance and water management, largely neglect the spatial and temporal variations in ET. Accurate regional ET maps would provide valuable information on actual crop water use. The objective of this study was mainly to evaluate a Pilot Project (PP) supported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). In this study, Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) model was used to assist the evaluation attempt. The performance of the ET model was evaluated by comparing the predicted daily ET with values derived by conventional methods based on ground measurements and meteorological data on 6 Sepetmber, 25 Sepetmber, 28 November and I I December. The ET values from SEBAL showed good agreement with the actual values measured in the field. The amount of water required to satisfy the irrigation needs at canal level was monitored and successfully estimated. However, during November the daily estimated water demand ranged from 15667 in 3 for Tereifi minor to 28954 m(3) for Heleiwa west minor canal. The average values of relative irrigation supply (RIS) were determined as 0.73 which indicates improvements in operational performance of minor canals. The results of this study demonstrate that remote sensing measurements and limited ground data can be used to successfully estimate ET and assess irrigation performance in areas of poor infrastructure. Results achieved support previous opinion that repeatedly recommended the PP as a crucial step for water management in the Gezira scheme, Sudan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据