4.4 Article

Robust Modeling of the Rocking Problem

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE
卷 138, 期 3, 页码 247-262

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000329

关键词

Rocking; Impacts; Friction; Non linear dynamics; Earthquake engineering

资金

  1. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1200859] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rocking motion of a solid block on a moving deformable base is a dynamic problem that, despite its apparent simplicity, involves a number of complex dynamic phenomena such as impacts, sliding, geometric and material nonlinearities and, under some circumstances, chaotic behavior. For this reason, since the first model proposed by G.W. Housner in 1963, a number of alternative models have been proposed for its mathematical simulation. In this work, two new models are developed for the simulation of a rigid body experiencing a 2D rocking motion on a moving deformable base. The first model, the concentrated springs model, simulates the ground as tensionless vertical springs with vertical dampers placed at each of the two bottom corners of the body, whereas the second, the Winkler model, simulates the ground as a continuous medium of tensionless vertical springs with vertical dampers. Both models take into consideration sliding (with the use of both a penalty method and an analytical formulation for friction) and uplift and both are geometrically nonlinear. The models are used for simple free vibrational problems in which the effects of the ground deformability, sliding, and uplift are noted. In addition, the stability diagram for various parameters of the system, under excitation by ground motions that correspond to one full cycle sine pulses with varying amplitude and frequency, is created. The behavior of the two models is discussed and compared with the classic theory proposed by Housner. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000329. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据