4.3 Review

Comorbidity associated with obesity in a large population: The APNA study

期刊

OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 435-447

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2015.04.003

关键词

Obesity; BMI; Risk factors; Comorbidity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Overweight and obesity are major causes of comorbidities which can lead to further morbidity and mortality. The main objective of the present study was to estimate the comorbidity associated with obesity in 40,010 patients attending Primary Health Care Centres in Navarra. Methods: It is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The association of overweight and obesity in different diseases was studied. Odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age and sex were calculated by unconditional logistic regression, using as reference patients with body mass index (BMI) lower than 25 kg/m(2). Results: Increasing BMI is associated with glucose intolerance (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06-1.08), dyslipidemia (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.04), hypertension (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.12-1.13), type 2 diabetes (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.10-1.11), kidney failure (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05), and osteoarthritis (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.05-1.06). Moreover, all the degrees of obesity are associated with asthma (OR type I obesity: 1.33; OR type II obesity: 1.69; OR type III obesity: 1.75), heart failure (OR type I obesity: 1.68; OR type II obesity: 2.78; OR type III obesity: 4.35), and severe mental disorders (OR type I obesity: 2.02; OR type II obesity: 2.33; OR type III obesity: 2.50). Type II and morbid obesity are associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression. Conclusion: Our study showed a positive association of the overweight and obesity with glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and kidney failure. An interesting point is the association of higher levels of BMI with depression. (C) 2015 Asian Oceanian Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据