Metallic Ureteral Stents: A Cost-Effective Method of Managing Benign Upper Tract Obstruction

Introduction: The management of patients with upper urinary tract obstruction who are not candidates for definitive reconstruction often presents a challenge. We report our initial experience with the Resonance (Cook Urological, Spencer, IN) metallic ureteral stent for the management of benign ureteral obstruction and present a comparative cost analysis of metallic to standard polymer stent use. Methods: Data were retrospectively gathered on all patients undergoing metallic ureteral stent placement for benign causes from July 2007 to February 2009. Baseline demographics, previous method of drainage, pre- and postoperative creatinine levels, procedural complications, stent-related side effects, and metallic stent dwell time were recorded. The cost of stent maintenance for polymer and metallic stents for a 12-month interval was calculated for each patient. Results: Fifteen stents were placed in 13 patients to manage obstruction due to a variety of benign etiologies. Metallic stents provided adequate drainage in 12/13 patients, but were discontinued prematurely in 3 patients (2 for voiding symptoms, 1 for hematuria). Eight patients had their metallic stents changed after a mean time of 11.6 months, with no encrustation. The yearly cost associated with polymer and metallic stent use was $23,999 and $11,183, respectively. This amounted to a $10,394 annual cost reduction (43%) for each patient. Conclusions: Metallic ureteral stents provide effective upper tract drainage for the majority of patients with benign upper tract obstruction, with significant cost benefit, largely because of the shorter exchange interval.