4.4 Article

Factors Affecting Blood Loss During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Balloon Dilation in a Large Contemporary Series

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 207-211

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0402

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Renal hemorrhage is a common and worrisome complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). We review factors affecting blood loss and transfusion requirements in a large contemporary series of patients undergoing PNL utilizing balloon dilation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing PNL at one institution from July 2000 to January 2008. Demographics, stone parameters, perioperative factors, complications, and stone-free rates were evaluated. Hemorrhage was estimated using hematocrit and blood transfusion requirement. Various factors were assessed for their association with blood loss using univariate models. Results: The 225 patients reviewed had a mean stone size of 3.5 +/- 1.8 cm (range, 0.6-9.0 cm), with 54 (23.4%) staghorn and 93 (40.3%) partial staghorn calculi. One hundred and seventy-five (75.8%), 173 (74.9%), and 80 (34.6%) had pelvic, lower pole, and upper pole calculi, respectively. Multiple access tracts were used in 12 (5.2%) patients, with overall stone-free and complication rates of 80.4% and 14.1%. Complications included postoperative fever in 15 patients (6.4%), clinically insignificant pleural effusion in 8 patients (3.4%), 2 (0.8%) renal artery pseudoaneurysms requiring angioembolization, and 1 (0.4%) urinoma requiring stent placement. Mean hematocrit decrease was 6.1 +/- 4.3%, with three (1.3%) patients receiving blood transfusions. On univariate analysis no other statistically significant differences were found between hematocrit decrease and stone size or location, presence of partial or complete staghorn calculi, diabetes, or number of access tracts. Conclusions: We report a comparable stone-free rate and a lower incidence of blood transfusion among patients undergoing PNL using balloon dilation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据