4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Mineralized Tissue Formation by Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7-transfected Pulp Stem Cells (Retracted article. See vol. 38, pg. 868, 2012)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 170-176

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.010

关键词

Adenovirus; bone morphogenetic protein-7; dental pulp stem cell; gene therapy; regenerative endodontics

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81000679]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [3082026]
  3. Youth Chenguang Project of Science and Technology of Wuhan City, China [201150431106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) is a well-established agent to induce bone and dentin formation. Little is understood until now whether BMP-7 could be used to genetically modify human dental pulp stem cells for tissue engineering applications. Methods: This study was to determine the feasibility of mineralized tissue formation from human dental pulp-derived stem cells (DPSCs) transfected with adenoviral-mediated human BMP-7 gene through in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Results: In vitro results of alkaline phosphatase, calcium content, and real-time polymerase chain reaction showed that BMP-7 transfected cells had the ability to differentiate towards the odontoblast phenotype and produce a calcified extracellular matrix. Transfected cell were seeded onto a porous ceramic scaffold and implanted subcutaneously in mice. Samples were retrieved after 4 and 8 weeks for histology evaluation. The results indicated that only the cultures with BMP-7 gene transfection showed obvious hard-tissue generation. Conclusions: Our data suggest that adenovirus-mediated BMP-7 expression can induce odontogenic differentiation of human DPSCs and show effectively mineralized tissue formation in vivo, which may provide support for gene therapy candidate of BMP-7 in dental tissue engineering. (J Endod 2012;38:170-176)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据