4.5 Article

Residual and Antimicrobial Activity of Final Irrigation Protocols on Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm in Dentin

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 363-366

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.036

关键词

Biofilms; cetrimide; chlorhexidine; EDTA; Enterococcus faecalis; maleic acid; sodium hypochlorite

资金

  1. Research Group of the Junta de Andalucia, Spain [CTS-167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The use of root canal irrigating solutions exerting antimicrobial activity and prolonged residual activity is desirable in order to control dentin infection and delay reinfection of the root canal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the residual antimicrobial activity and the capacity to eradicate Enterococcus faecalis biofilm of different irrigating solutions, alone and in combination, in a dentin-volumetric test. Methods: Solutions of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexicine (CHX), 0.2% cetrimide (CTR), 17% ethyl-endiaminetetraacetic (EDTA), 7% maleic acid (MA), and regimens of 2.5% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA or 7% MA and 0.2% CTR or 2% CHX were used to determine their residual activity by exposing treated dentin blocks to E. faecalis for 24 hours. Antimicrobial activity was assayed on 3-week biofilm formed on dentin blocks. Results of residual activity and antimicrobial activity. were respectively expressed as the inhibition percentage of biofilm formation and the kill percentage of biofilm. Results: A 2% CHX and 0.2% CTR solution showed 100% biofilm inhibition; 2.5% NaOCl showed the lowest residual activity (18.10%). The kill percentage of 2.5% NaOCl and 0.2% CTR was 100% followed by 7% MA and 2% CHX, whereas 17% EDTA was the least effective (44%). Solutions of 7% MA or 17% EDTA followed by 0.2% CTR or 2% CHX showed 100% residual and antimicrobial activity. Conclusions: A 0.2% CTR solution alone and the combinations in which 2% CHX or 0.2% CTR was the final irrigating solution achieved the maximum residual and antimicrobial activity. (J Endod 2011;37:363-366)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据