4.5 Article

An In Vitro Spectroscopic Analysis to Determine Whether Para-Chloroaniline Is Produced from Mixing Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 315-317

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.028

关键词

Chlorhexidine; nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); para-chloroaniline; sodium hypochlorite

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Science Foundation [S10 RR019012, CHE-0521323]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine whether para-chloroaniline (PCA) is formed through the reaction of mixing sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Methods: Initially, commercially available samples of chlorhexidine acetate (CHXa) and PCA were analyzed with H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Two solutions, NaOCl and CHXa, were warmed to 37 degrees C, and when mixed they produced a brown precipitate. This precipitate was separated in half, and pure PCA was added to 1 of the samples for comparison before they were each analyzed with H-1 NMR spectroscopy. Results: The peaks in the H-1 NMR spectra of CHXa and PCA were assigned to specific protons of the molecules, and the location of the aromatic peaks in the PCA spectrum defined the PCA doublet region. Although the spectrum of the precipitate alone resulted in a complex combination of peaks, on magnification there were no peaks in the PCA doublet region that were intense enough to be quantified. In the spectrum of the precipitate to which PCA was added, 2 peaks do appear in the PCA doublet region. Comparing this spectrum with that of precipitate alone, the peaks in the PCA doublet region are not visible before the addition of PCA. Conclusions: On the basis of this in vitro study, the reaction mixture of NaOCl and CHXa does not produce PCA at any measurable quantity, and further investigation is needed to determine the chemical composition of the brown precipitate. (J Endod 2010;36:315-317)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据