4.5 Article

Thermoneutral housing does not influence fat mass or glucose homeostasis in C57BL/6 mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 239, 期 3, 页码 313-324

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/JOE-18-0279

关键词

ambient temperature; thermoneutrality; energy balance; glucose metabolism

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One major factor affecting physiology often overlooked when comparing data from animal models and humans is the effect of ambient temperature. The majority of rodent housing is maintained at similar to 22 degrees C, the thermoneutral temperature for lightly clothed humans. However, mice have a much higher thermoneutral temperature of similar to 30 degrees C, consequently data collected at 22 degrees C in mice could be influenced by animals being exposed to a chronic cold stress. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of housing temperature on glucose homeostasis and energy metabolism of mice fed normal chow or a high-fat, obesogenic diet (HFD). Male C57BL/6J((Arc)) mice were housed at standard temperature (22 degrees C) or at thermoneutrality (29 degrees C) and fed either chow or a 60% HFD for 13 weeks. The HFD increased fat mass and produced glucose intolerance as expected but this was not exacerbated in mice housed at thermoneutrality. Changing the ambient temperature, however, did alter energy expenditure, food intake, lipid content and glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle, liver and brown adipose tissue. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that mice regulate energy balance at different housing temperatures to maintain whole-body glucose tolerance and adiposity irrespective of the diet. Despite this, metabolic differences in individual tissues were apparent. In conclusion, dietary intervention in mice has a greater impact on adiposity and glucose metabolism than housing temperature although temperature is still a significant factor in regulating metabolic parameters in individual tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据